Analytical Study on RC Framed Structures on effect of Performance of Different types of Piles in Seismic Region
Abstract
This thesis includes Analytical Study on RC Framed Structures on effect of Performance of Pile Foundation in Seismic Region. For our design section of a RC framed residential high rise building we are comparing mass irregularities and vertical irregularities with respect to Time period, Frequency, Displacement, Storey Drift Ratio and Storey Shear for Friction pile and End Bearing Pile
Keywords
Download Options
Introduction
Piles are long and thin individuals which exchange the heap to further soil or shake of high bearing limit keeping away from shallow soil of low bearing limits the principle sorts of materials utilized for heaps are Wood, steel and cement. Heap establishments are the structure used to convey and exchange the heap of the structure to the bearing ground situated at some profundity UG surface. The principle segments of the establishment are the heap top and the heaps. Heaps worked from these materials are driven, penetrated or jacked into the ground and associated with heap tops. In view of sort of soil, heap material and load transmitting trademark heaps are arranged appropriately.
Conclusion
The Current Study makes an effort to estimate the effect of performance of End Bearing Pile and Friction Pile in seismic region of a multi storey structure situated in zone V on medium type of soil. The study also spreads to find the structural parameters like Time Period, Maximum Lateral Displacement, Storey Drift ratio and Storey Shear.
The Study leads to following conclusions:
6.1 Time Period
By considering all the three cases Friction pile is giving good result than compared to End Bearing Pile.
6.2 Frequency
In all the three cases, the Frequency for End Bearing Pile is more when compared to Friction Pile.
As the frequency of a wave increases, the time period of the wave decreases.
6.3 Maximum Lateral Displacement
By considering all the three cases,
Earthquake response of the building in x-direction is reduced in End Bearing Pile.
Earthquake response of the building in y-direction is reduced in Friction Pile
6.4 Storey Drift Ratio
For case one - End Bearing Pile is giving good result for both x-direction and y- direction.
For case two - End Bearing Pile is giving good result in x-direction. Both End Bearing Pile and Friction Pile are giving similar results in y- direction.
For case three - End Bearing Pile is giving good result for both x-direction and y- direction.
6.5 Storey Shear
If earthquake acts in x-direction then End Bearing Pile gives good result when compared to friction pile.
If earthquake acts in y-direction then Friction Pile gives good result when compared to End Bearing pile.
Overall it is concluded that End Bearing Pile performs better than Friction Pile in most of the above stated parameters.