Plagiarism Policy - International Multispeciality Journal of Health (IJOER)

Zero Tolerance Policy

IJOER maintains a strict zero-tolerance policy for plagiarism, data fabrication, and all forms of academic misconduct. Manuscripts violating this policy face immediate rejection, retraction after publication, and notification to institutional authorities.

IJOER Plagiarism Policy - Academic Integrity in Literature and Cultural Studies Research
Overview

IJOER maintains the highest standard of academic integrity and ethical publishing practices. We are dedicated to upholding intellectual property rights while assuring the credibility and reliability of published research in literature and cultural studies. This policy works in conjunction with our Journal Ethics Policy and Peer Review Policy.

1. Our Commitment to Academic Integrity

The International Multispeciality Journal of Health (IJOER) maintains the highest standard of academic integrity and ethical publishing practices. We have a zero-tolerance policy for plagiarism in any form and take extensive, effective measures for its detection and prevention at every step of the publishing process.

Integrated Policy Framework

Our plagiarism policy is part of a comprehensive ethical framework that includes our Journal Ethics Policy, Peer Review Policy, and Publication Ethics guidelines. All manuscripts are evaluated within this integrated framework to ensure academic integrity.

Zero Tolerance

IJOER follows a strict zero-tolerance policy regarding plagiarism, data fabrication, and all other forms of academic or professional misconduct.

Outcomes may include:

  • Immediate rejection of manuscripts
  • Retraction after publication
  • Notification to author's institution
  • Blacklisting from future submissions
Comprehensive Monitoring

We implement multi-layered detection systems throughout the publishing lifecycle as outlined in our Publication Process:

  • Pre-submission screening
  • Peer review vigilance
  • Post-publication monitoring
  • Continuous database checks

2. What Constitutes Plagiarism

Plagiarism includes various kinds of academic dishonesty where there is unauthorized use of others' intellectual work without proper acknowledgment. Authors should refer to our Author Guidelines for detailed citation requirements.

Type Description Examples
Verbatim Plagiarism Direct copying of text without proper attribution Direct copying without quotation marks, reproducing significant amounts of others' work, poor citation of source materials
Paraphrasing Plagiarism Inadequate paraphrasing without citation Restructuring sentences without citation, changing words but maintaining original structure, failure to acknowledge original ideas
Mosaic Plagiarism Combining phrases from multiple sources Combining phrases from several sources, patchwriting (bad synthesis), poor citation of combined sources
Self-Plagiarism Reusing significant portions of own previously published work Reusing significant amounts of own work, republishing already published research, duplicate submission to other journals
Related Policy: For information on permissible reuse of content, please see our Article Sharing Policy and Content Updation Policy.

3. Other Types of Academic Dishonesty

Fabrication & Falsification
  • Fabrication: Creation of false research data or results
  • Data Falsification: Manipulating research data to reach desired conclusions
Authorship & Citation Issues
  • Citation Manipulation: Improper citing practices to artificially increase impact
  • Authorship Misrepresentation: Improper attribution of author contributions
See Also: Our Research Data Policy provides guidelines for data integrity and transparency in research.

4. Plagiarism Detection and Screening Process

Multi-Tier Detection Methodology

IJOER uses a comprehensive plagiarism detection methodology across the entire manuscript processing lifecycle as detailed in our Publication Process page.

Initial Screening Phase
  • Automated similarity check against global databases
  • Comparison with published literature and online sources
  • Cross-referencing with our internal manuscript database
  • Manual review by editorial staff of flagged content
  • Similarity index threshold analysis
  • Contextual assessment of matched content
Peer Review Integration

Reviewers are instructed to be vigilant for plagiarism during evaluation as per our Peer Review Policy:

  • Assessment of proper citation practices
  • Verification of novel contribution
  • Identification of unattributed content
  • Evaluation of methodological originality
  • Cross-checking of references
  • Contextual analysis of similar content
Post-Publication Monitoring

Continuous monitoring ensures ongoing integrity of published content. For details on post-publication corrections, see our Article Withdrawal Policy:

  • Regular automated checks of published articles
  • Investigation of reader-reported concerns
  • Cross-verification with new publications
  • Periodic audits of older content

5. Acceptable Similarity Thresholds and Guidelines

Note: These are general thresholds. The nature and context of matched content is subject to critical evaluation. Low percentages of similarity may also be unacceptable if they involve key conceptual content, descriptions of methodology, or central arguments. For specific cases, consult our FAQ section.
Similarity Level Assessment Required Action
< 10% Generally Acceptable Proceed with normal review process
10% - 15% Requires Checking Editorial review of matched content, author may be asked for clarification
15% - 25% Problematic Level Author explanation and revision required before proceeding with review
> 25% Unacceptable Immediate rejection or retraction, subject to editorial committee review

6. Consequences of Plagiarism Violations

During Submission Process
  • Immediate rejection of manuscript
  • Notification to corresponding author
  • Blacklisting of authors for 2-5 years
  • Reporting to institutional authorities
  • Notification to funding agencies
After Publication
  • Retracting the article immediately
  • Public retraction notice
  • Notification to indexing databases
  • Institutional reporting
  • Permanent author blacklisting
Due Process

Authors accused of plagiarism are given an opportunity to respond before any sanctions are issued. Our editorial board examines these matters carefully, taking into account all evidence and author explanations before making final decisions. For formal procedures, refer to our Journal Ethics Policy.

7. Prevention and Best Practices

Proper Citation Practices
  • Cite all sources in APA 7th edition style
  • Use quotation marks for direct quotes
  • Provide page numbers for specific references
  • Acknowledge the ideas and concepts of others
  • Cite unpublished work and personal communications
  • Maintain consistent citation style throughout
  • Verify all references for accuracy
  • Include DOI or stable URLs where available
Effective Paraphrasing Techniques
Do's
  • Completely rephrase ideas in your own words
  • Change sentence structure and vocabulary
  • Preserve original meaning using new expressions
  • Always cite the original source
Don'ts
  • Don't just change a few words
  • Don't maintain the original sentence structure
  • Don't use source's distinctive phrases
  • Don't forget to cite paraphrased content
Self-Checking Tools

Before submitting your article, use these verification methods:

  • Use plagiarism detection software before submission
  • Review similarity reports carefully
  • Address all flagged content appropriately
  • Keep detailed research notes and references
  • Maintain a record of all source materials
Authorship Management

Follow our Board Member Policies for authorship guidelines:

  • Clearly define author contributions
  • Disclose all previous publications of similar work
  • Acknowledge all funding sources and support
  • Obtain permissions for reproduced material
  • Maintain research integrity throughout the process

8. Appeal and Resolution Process

Authors are allowed to appeal plagiarism accusations via a formal procedure. For complete details on our dispute resolution process, see our Journal Ethics Policy.

Initial Response

Send written explanation within 14 days of notification

Evidence Review

Provide supporting documentation and original sources

Committee Review

Case reviewed by plagiarism committee

Final Decision

Written notice of appeal decision

Submission of Appeals

Appeals should be submitted to:

info.IJOER@gmail.com or info@globalacademician.com

Include detailed explanation and supporting evidence in your appeal submission. You can also visit our Contact Page for additional communication options.

Questions About Plagiarism Policy?

For any questions about plagiarism policies, self-checking procedures, or specific citation-related queries, our ethics committee can be reached at:

Email: info.IJOER@gmail.com or info@globalacademician.com

We are happy to help authors who want to confirm that their manuscripts meet our integrity expectations. Visit our Contact Us page for more information or check our FAQ section for common queries.